Irreal

Governments all over the world are sparing no effort to discover and prosecute members of Anonymous. It only makes sense. After all they do patently illegal things like launching DOS attacks against sites they don’t like or have a grievance with. Clearly bad guys who deserve no leniency.

Except, it turns out that governments are doing the same things. Not only are they doing the same things they claim it’s perfectly justified in the pursuit of justice. Why should their hands be tied, after all?

Yes, but they’re going after bad guys so it’s justified. Actually not. There appears to be a lot of innocent bystanders suffering too. This particular case comes from Britain so I’m not as familiar with the legal system but it’s hard to see how they can justify doing things for which they jail others. Just remember this the next time your government is in high dungeon about those criminal hackers sullying our sacred Internet.

I’ve written before, here and here, about the U.S. Government’s scandalous behavior in the case of a woman, Rahinah Ibrahim, placed on the no-fly list. The government did everything they could to make the case disappear, including refusing to grant Ibrahim a visa so that she could testify, placing her daughter, a U.S. citizen, on the no-fly list so that she could not return home to testify, and then lying to the court claiming that they hadn’t done any of those things. They also claimed that publicly available information was a state secret that couldn’t be introduced at trial.

In those previous posts, I wrote that I was objecting to the government’s heavy handed and bad faith actions and that I didn’t know whether placing Ibrahim on the no-fly list was justified or not. Now we know the answer. It turns out that she was placed on the list by mistake. FBI agent Kevin Kelley mistakenly checked the wrong box¹ on a form that resulted in her placement on the list. The evidence also suggests that he was filling out the form because he confused Jemaah Islah Malaysia, a Malaysian professional organization composed primarily of those who had studied in the U.S. with Jemaah Islamiyah, an organization on the government’s designated foreign terrorists list.

As I wrote in my second post, the judge initially released only a summary of his findings giving the government a chance to appeal the full decision’s release. Now the (slightly redacted) decision is available. The judge is remarkably even tempered in his remarks. He doesn’t call out the government for their duplicity although he does describe the government’s treatment of Ibrahim as “Kafkaesque” and ordered that the she be removed from all the watch lists she may have been put on and that the government produce sworn depositions that they have complied.