Chris Maiorana asks a provocative question: What’s the future of Emacs? He asks that question in the context of assuming that Emacs will continue to exist for any timeline that matters to us. But how, he asks, will we use it?
The answer that will occur to most of us is speech mediated input á la Star Trek TNG. We’ll simply tell Emacs what we want it to do and it will do it. But think about that for a moment. Would you really want to dictate the code for your latest program to the computer? Or would you even want to dictate your documentation, story, or letter to your computer?
Sure, you could say something like, “Computer write a program to do such and such.” but then you’re not using Emacs at all. The same for asking the computer to write something for you. That—more or less—is here today but most of us don’t like the results and, again, we’re not really using Emacs in those situations.
For my part, my written thoughts are always much better organized than my spoken ones so even with capable voice input, I’d much prefer to use the keyboard. Maiorana agrees. He points back to a couple of episodes from Tales From the Darkside1 in which people use the keyboard to do magic with the computer. For him, Meta+x is the spell that enables the magic and he’s very attached to it. Like me, he doesn’t anticipate abandoning the keyboard.
What do you think? Will we still use the keyboard or will we move on to something better?
Footnotes:
You can find Mookie and Pookie and Word Processor of the Gods in the Internet Archive.