What do you think? Is Emacs slow or is that just another instance of Emacs hater FUD? The most frequent complaint I see about Emacs—with the possible exception of its lack of bling—is that it’s too slow.
I don’t understand that. Maybe that’s because I’m old enough to have used some genuinely slow tools but I’m pretty sure it’s just that I have more sensible standards. Sure, other editors may be faster at one task or another but I have always found the differences in speed essentially undetectable by human beings in their normal workflows. In other words, Emacs is fast enough where it counts.
Corwin Brust over at Corwin’s Emacs Blog examines this question in his blog post, The Turtle and the Snail. The title comes from a joke involving a turtle and snail that has application to the question of Emacs’ speed. I’ll let you check out the joke on Brust’s post but the TL;DR is that speed—at least if we aren’t speaking of light—depends on the observer.
Brust mentions a related complaint: “[I]t consumes too much of my time, to understand and configure, and to enhance it.” That’s just plain silly. Unless you’re one of those people who demands instant gratification and are unwilling to expend any effort to attain it, the complaint is frivolous. When I started, I printed out the cheat sheet and was using Emacs reasonably productively on the first day. To be sure, I wasn’t as fast as I was with Vim but that came fairly quickly.
As for understanding and configuring it, we all know that that’s a lifetime journey. Like every other Emacs user, I’m still learning new things about Emacs and my init.el is a lifelong project. If this idea of a lifetime commitment bothers you, perhaps Emacs is not for you.