Pretty much shows the FBI is being a bit disingenuous:
Going dark? Crypto was a problem in a grand total of FOUR wiretaps last year. http://t.co/zZlDRzGFLi pic.twitter.com/zGALMT39cd
— matt blaze (@mattblaze) July 1, 2015
Pretty much shows the FBI is being a bit disingenuous:
Going dark? Crypto was a problem in a grand total of FOUR wiretaps last year. http://t.co/zZlDRzGFLi pic.twitter.com/zGALMT39cd
— matt blaze (@mattblaze) July 1, 2015
I’ve recently experienced a canonical instance of the Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon. Until the other day, I had no idea that Emacs had a built-in spreadsheet. Now, I’m seeing references to ses (Simple Emacs Spreadsheet) everywhere. It even has its own manual.
I use Org-mode tables and Babel for that sort of thing but it’s nice to see that if you really want a spreadsheet, Emacs has one for you. One of the nice things about ses is that you use normal Elisp to calculate cell values. That give you both familiarity and flexibility.
This discovery probably isn’t life changing but it is another example of how Emacs always has something new to show you. If you want to try it out, type 【Meta+x】 ses-mode in a new buffer.
The tireless Artur Malabarba has shown us how to make custom Org links for special purposes before (1, 2). Now he shows us how to implement Markdown links. The point here is that with Markdown, you define a link and associated ID once and can refer to it any number of times thereafter by mentioning its ID.
That’s nice if you refer to the link several times in your document. Instead of looking up the URL each time, you can give it an ID and then use that ID each time you want to refer to it. This could be especially useful if you later need to change the URL for some reason.
Malabarba’s implementation takes 3 simple functions, two of which are required by the Org Link mechanism. It’s pretty easy and could be really useful for certain types of workflows. Take a look at his post for the details.
For all you puzzle constructors out there:
How to create a crossword puzzle in LaTeX http://t.co/0BdZcYhRyA
— TeX tips (@TeXtip) July 7, 2015
The cwpuzzle makes it really easy to typeset a crossword puzzle. If you want to try your hand but don’t know how to lay out a puzzle, there are plenty of sites to help you.
Last time, I wrote about how Bin Chen writes in Org mode and exports the final document to Word doc format. Most engineers are spared the indignity of having to produce Word documents but if you’re a writer producing anything other than technical books, you will almost certainly have to deliver your work as a Word file. That makes a lot of sense for publishers, as I’ve written about previously, but it’s a real pain for technically literate writers.
Tony Ballantyne is a Science Fiction writer and an Emacs user. Ballantyne has an excellent post on his Emacs Writing Setup. The post covers how he uses the various Emacs tools—including Org mode—to organize his books, take notes, record ideas, and maintain a style sheet.
Like Bin Chen, he exports the results to odt format when he’s done. His process seems a little simpler than Chen’s. He just exports it to odt, loads it into whatever Word clone he’s using, and saves it as a doc file. That’s an extra manual step but not an onerous one.
If you use Emacs for writing and need to deliver the result as a Word document, you should definitely read Ballantyne’s post. Even if you’re not a professional writer banging out fiction, Ballantyne has some good tips of making the most of Emacs for the task. If you like his writing tips, checkout his Emacs Workout page that links to many of his writing-with-Emacs posts.
If you’re like me, you’d rather take a pencil in the eye than write using Word or any of its evil spawn. Sometimes, though, you really need to deliver a doc file. Even in a lead engineer position I sometimes had to produce documents for management that they would tweak and send to, say, their lawyers. Needless to say, management wasn’t interested in an Org file, whatever the hell that is.
So. A conundrum. On the one hand a cranky engineer who didn’t want to fire up Word, and on the other, suits who didn’t know there was any way to produce documents besides Word. What to do? Not all that long ago the choices were
Neither was very satisfactory so we’re lucky that today’s Org mode has a better answer. Since Org 7.8, you can export an Org document to odt format and from there to doc format.
Bin Chen explains how to automate the process of converting an Org document to a Word document in doc format. It’s a pretty simple process involving specifying what you want the end format to be and what tool (LibreOffice by default) should be used to convert from odt to the final format.
If you occasionally have to produce documents in doc format, you should definitely take a look at Chen’s post. Tomorrow, we’ll revisit this subject from the point of view of a fiction writer that has to deliver drafts in doc format but much prefers working in Emacs.
Remember all those apologies from Lenovo after their stealth installation of the SuperFish adware was revealed? Apparently they didn’t really mean them.
As the old saying goes, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.” Unless you, too, want to end up a 50 year joke like Charlie Brown, Lucy, and the football, you’d better think twice about buying products from this company. If you do, you have no one but yourself to blame when the inevitable happens.
Lenovo has forfeited any expectation of trust from their customers. And who would want to deal with a company so lacking in common sense that they install another root kit on their computers less than 6 months after being excoriated for doing the same thing?
I know lots of people who love their Lenovo laptops and dismissed the concerns over SuperFish on the grounds that they wiped the machine and installed Linux. This latest exploit hides the malware in the system’s firmware where it can’t be removed. I’ll bet that when Lenovo decides it’s to their advantage to do so, they’ll find a way to hook into Linux too.
Advertisers: clean up your act or look forward to a future like this
Ad exec in 2000: Annoying ads perform better.
in 2010: Ads based on tracking users perform better.
in 2017: Why are all our ads blocked?
— Brian Smith (@BRIAN_____) August 10, 2015