Irreal

If you were a Google Reader user and neglected to retrieve your subscription data from Google, there’s a reprieve of sorts. Although Google Reader is no longer operating, Google is keeping your Reader data available until 2013-07-15. After that it’s gone forever.

If you haven’t already rescued your data, head on over to Google Takeout and get it before it’s too late.

Google Reader is going away on Monday. That means that Reeder, my RSS reader of choice, is going to stop working. So far, only the Reeder iPhone app has been updated. That’s useless to me because the iPhone screen is too small for me to comfortably read large amounts of text. I might be willing to use an up-to-date iPad app until the Mac version is ready but that’s not ready either.

I’ve heard good things about Feedly so, with time running out, I created an account and imported my data. The one button import worked perfectly and easily. It was literally just clicking the button and then signing into Google Reader. I haven’t set up the iPad app yet but so far I’ve been very happy with the Mac version. That’s really browser based but there’s a plugin for Safari.

In some ways having the Mac interface be browser based is an advantage. I don’t have to switch applications when I want, for example, to bookmark an article. The preview function is better than Reeder’s was and it’s easy to pop up another browser window with the article in it if you need the full browser functionality. That’s the case if you want to bookmark or clip to Evernote, for example.

The interface is simple to use and typing ? will pop up a help screen with the keyboard shortcuts. The syncing (between my two Macs) works fine so I’m confident that the iPad app will stay in sync too. That’s really my main requirement. I read RSS on my two Macs and my iPad and I need them to stay in sync.

My only concern is that the service is free—and we all know where that can lead—but my notes (that I’ve been accumulating about alternative readers) indicate that there will be a paid version as well. That’s welcome news. After the Google Reader Apocalypse, I’ve upgraded most of my free services to the paid version.

So far, I like Feedly and don’t foresee any reasons to switch. Just in case, though, I exported my subscriptions with Google Takeout. If you have a lot of saved posts, tags, and other information, you should take a look at this post from Mihai Parparita. It describes a tool that let’s you get all your Google Reader data, not just the subscriptions.

I guess our secrets are safe now.

Careful Irreal readers will have detected that I’m not much of a fan of the Press. Yes, yes, a free press is vital to a free and democratic society and all that. I just wish they’d do a better job.

Case in point: the continuing scandal over government snooping in Western democracies. This scandal—I consider it a scandal—is arguably the most important story in decades. The snooping raises serious questions and, according to one view, poses grave dangers for our democracies. Others say that this government intrusion is the price we pay to keep us safe. Both are honest viewpoints and deserve discussion and analysis. One would think that the story was worth a little reportorial effort and investigation.

Instead we get Edward Snowden. Is he a hero? A Traitor? Something else? Whole legions of reporters crowded into the Moscow airport trying to catch a glimpse of him and accosted hapless travelers with photos of Snowden on their iPads asking if anyone had seen him. As amusing as it was to watch Snowden leading them around in circles and getting them to board an aircraft he wasn’t on, it’s really beside the point. Even Snowden says he’s beside the point. All this Keystone Kop comedy would be okay if the press were also following the main story but they aren’t. It’s all Snowden, all day.

The mandarins at the NSA must be smiling. Instead of being hounded by the press to explain themselves and justify their actions, they can sit back and watch the press chase after a mostly irrelevant side story. It’s not like there aren’t some serious questions that need asking but the press seems content to swallow whole any claim the government makes no matter how silly. Some examples:

• Congressman Mike Rogers, an ex-FBI agent who surely knows better, claiming that Americans needn’t worry about the wholesale vacuuming up of their phone call metadata because no names, only phone numbers, are attached to the records. Perhaps he thinks we’ve never heard of phone books.
• General Keith Alexander, Director of the NSA, claiming, without offering any particulars, that dozens of terrorist plots were foiled through this snooping. Wouldn’t a diligent press demand examples and some details?
• Atty Gen. Holder saying that the leaks were “extremely damaging” and put the security of the U.S. at risk. Left unexplained was how revealing the perfectly obvious and well known fact that the NSA monitors pretty much all communications damages anything other than their ability to continue extra-constitutional invasions of innocent citizens’ privacy.
• General Raymond Odierno, Army Chief of Staff, saying that “…it puts American soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines at risk who are overseas conducting operations.” It’s hard to see what, exactly, those risks are and the General doesn’t say.
• And perhaps most laughable of all, the oft repeated claim that Al Qaeda has already changed their communication behavior due to Snowden’s revelations.

All of these just beg for followup and investigation—it certainly wouldn’t be difficult—but the press is off chasing Snowden and earnestly discussing whether he will end up in Cuba or Ecuador. Again, this is a serious story with serious implications for us all and an open and serious discussion about it is urgently needed. Instead the press obsesses about Edward Snowden.