New AT&T/NSA docs show "We were treated as crazy for years for allegations that we now know are substantially true.” https://t.co/R8TSG6Figr
— Julia Angwin (@JuliaAngwin) August 17, 2015
New AT&T/NSA docs show "We were treated as crazy for years for allegations that we now know are substantially true.” https://t.co/R8TSG6Figr
— Julia Angwin (@JuliaAngwin) August 17, 2015
Jon-Michael Deldin has a short post detailing how to schedule periodic events in Emacs. Most of us probably don’t want to have Emacs natter at us as implemented in Deldin’s example but it’s easy to imagine many helpful uses for the run-with-idle-timer function.
More useful, perhaps, are the run-with-timer and run-at-time functions. The run-with-idle-timer function runs a function when Emacs has been idle for some period of time. The other two run every \(n\) seconds (run-with-timer) or at a specific time and optionally every \(n\) seconds thereafter (run-at-time).
The latter two functions are very flexible and perform a bit differently depending on their arguments so be sure to read their documentation. If you want to do things like schedule a git push every hour (or when Emacs is otherwise idle), these functions could be just what you need.
If you’re running OS X and use the native mail app, you know that it can be hard to integrate the GPG encryption suite. Fortunately, there’s a custom solution for the Mac called GPGTools that integrates GPG with OS X and the mail app. I’ve been using it for several years and have been very happy with it. It’s actively maintained and high quality software.
It’s not hard to install and I doubt any Irreal reader would have the slightest problem. But, of course, we all have an Aunt Millie who needs a bit of extra help. Happily, Jeff Reifman over at Tuts+ has an excellent how to on installing and configuring the PGPTools suite. The process is easy and if we can get a substantial number of people to install and use it, we’ll be on our way to ubiquitous encryption and a safer Internet.
Schrödinger: How’s my cat, Doc?
Vet: I have good news and bad news..
— Viktor Winetrout, Jr (@Cpin42) October 6, 2014
Irreal readers know I like and use Apple products but I’m not a paid up member of the cult so I seldom write about the subject. The most fascinating thing about Apple, I think, is the derangement syndrome that it induces in many journalists. Some of the most entertaining articles I read are the Macalope’s merciless mocking of those journalists.
Over at Tech Crunch Jon Evans has a particularly silly article warning us that we shouldn’t use Apple’s products. Why? Well, because Apple makes it hard to jailbreak iOS devices and sometime in the future they might decide—despite their history of protecting their customers’ privacy—to get in bed with the NSA and other snoopers and then where would we be?
I couldn’t begin to adequately mock this nonsense but fortunately I don’t have to. John Gruber over at Daring Fireball does an excellent and entertaining job of debunking it for me. The Macalope hasn’t yet turned his antlers on Evans but I’m sure he will and I’m sure the result will also be amusing.
There are probably good arguments for why someone might prefer to use Android devices over iOS devices but Evans sure hasn’t given us one. If you want to make the argument, at least be serious.
Update before publication: That didn’t take long. Here’s the Macalope with a righteous takedown of Evans’ silliness.
Who can argue?
Services that claim to "cost less than your daily coffee" are seriously deluded if they think they're as important as my daily coffee.
— Artur Malabarba (@AMalabarba) August 22, 2015
In a comment to one of my recent posts (1, 2) on converting from Org mode to Word doc format, Grant Rettke pointed me to an interesting Org Mode mailing list thread on how academics leverage Org mode for writing their research articles. It’s a great thread and if you have a need to convert your Org documents to doc format, it’s definitely worth reading.
One problem that arises when collaborating with a Word-using colleague is that they will want to turn on tracking and make their changes and comments directly in the document. You can, of course, simply copy the changes back into your Org document but that’s a hassle. Happily, in one of the posts, Ken Mankoff outlines a method for getting those changes back into your Org document. Rettke captures the method in a recent post on his blog.
Once you have the Org document with the changes, you can do an ediff with the original to chose the changes you want to keep. For more on that idea, see Mickey Petersen’s post on writing a book with Emacs. He didn’t use Org mode but he did deal with integrating editorial changes back into his master file.
Now I don't have to worry if someone steals my potatoes: they're hashed and salted. pic.twitter.com/BMNxRK7c0H
— Jonathan Fuerth (@jfuerth) April 12, 2015
PIM export Karl Voit gave a lightning talk on Org Mode at the recent Chaos Computer Club Camp2015. Being a lightning talk is was pretty short. That’s too bad, I would have liked it to be a bit longer.
The talk was designed to be an introduction to Org mode so if you’re already a user you may be familiar with most of what Voit has to say. On the other hand, he explains how to use blockers and triggers in your TODO lists, which is something I didn’t know. Even if you’re an expert, you’ll enjoy Voit’s enthusiasm for Org mode. As he says, there’s nothing better for personal information management.
The talk starts at 1 hour 14 minutes so just advance to that time if you aren’t interested in the other talks.
There’s been an alarming increase in Law Enforcement’s campaigning for mandatory backdoors in communication software. They are increasingly taking their case “to the people” with dishonest Op Eds intended to induce fear of terrorism and the other four horsemen.
Bruce Schneier, an actual expert on these matters, explains why even if Law Enforcement got their backdoors it would only make the terrorism problem worse. His article has links to some of the nonsense that the FBI and others are pushing so you can see what they’re saying. Sadly, you may read Schneier’s piece but most of the people being subjected to the onslaught won’t so they’ll be getting only the lies and distortions.
You may want to read the article following the one above as well. It talks further about the war of words raging between Law Enforcement and the tech community. Both are from Schneier’s Crypto-Gram, a monthly newsletter on security matters. If you’re interested in the area you should definitely subscribe. It’s free and always has lots of good material.