Irreal

Over at The Art Of Not Asking Why, JTR suspects that I may be an apostate, or at least that I’m inconsistent. He notes, correctly, that I’m all in on Emacs in general and Org mode in particular, and yet I’ve lately expressed enthusiasm for the non-Emacs app Journelly. He wonders why. It’s a good question and an honest one that deserves an answer. I’m sure others are wondering too.

I explained my initial attraction in my first post on Journelly. The TL;DR is that I use the Apple Notes app to keep a running memo book of each day’s events but that I was looking for something a bit better. Journelly seemed like it might be an answer so I resolved to keep an eye on it. Shortly afterwards, Ramírez started a formal beta program and after some initial dithering I signed up and started playing with Journelly.

I will shortly write about my experiences with it but in this post I want to address why a dedicated Emacs/Org mode user, who writes virtually everything in Org mode, might want to use Journelly. The thing is even I am not always on my computer. Sometimes I’m out and about, and sometimes I’m just doing other things. That means that I’ll be using my iPhone. Apple’s policy prohibiting apps with interpreters means that Emacs will never be on iOS but even if it were, I can’t imagine that the experience would be very pleasant. What I need is a way of easily adding entries to my Memo Book and having those entries sync across all my devices, including my Mac.

That’s where Journelly shines. Although the beautiful iPhone display doesn’t suggest it, the records are actually recorded in standard Org mode. Since it’s also possible to store the Journelly files in the iCloud, you can get access to them with a Mac, iPad, or, I suppose, another iPhone.

Jack Baty has a nice post that describes how he’s sharing data between his iPhone and his Mac. He even has an Org template to capture entries on his Mac. It’s actually trivial and at this point I’m sharing Journelly data between my iPhone, Mac, and iPad.

Finally, Álvaro Ramírez also saw JTR’s post and wrote his own answer. The TL;DR there is, “Why not both?” Like me, he was looking for an easy way to take notes when he wasn’t at his computer but wanted to be able to access and edit them in Org mode as usual when he was. That’s why he arranged for the records to be kept in Org mode format.

Sure, as JTR says, there are apps like Beorg but they, while great, aren’t targeted at my—and presumably Ramírez’s—needs. It’s not a matter of choosing between Org and some proprietary app; it’s about choosing a useful Org front end for your iPhone.

As a coda to this post, JTR notes in a subsequent post that he didn’t realize that Journelly kept its records in Org format and now that he does, he better understands my attraction to it.

I just came across a link to this recently updated book on the plain text computing environment. It was, apparently, first written to describe Emacs 19.29 around 1997. That was a long time ago and Emacs has evolved considerably since then. Happily, the book has recently been updated to Emacs 29.4. It’s over 600 pages so there’s a lot of content.

You can see the book here, There’s an interactive menu on the left that will give you an idea of what’s available. Besides HTML, it’s available in PDF and various EPUB formats. At more than 600 pages there’s obviously lot of content but the author, Keith Waclena, says that while you could read it straight through, he doubts many people will. Rather, it’s designed to enable you to skip to any topic you’re interested in.

Obviously, I haven’t been through the book in detail—having just discovered it—but it seems like a useful resource, especially for users new to Emacs. Take a look, especially if your a n00b.

Here’s yet another post commenting on something that Bozhidar Batsov wrote on Emacs Redux. I like to write about his posts because they typically look at some Emacs functionality that we all thought we knew about and tells us things about that functionality that we didn’t know.

His latest post is about flyspell. I’ve been using flyspell for so long that I have no memory of when I started or how I discovered it. On the other hand, my sole use of it is to invoke flyspell-auto-correct-previous-word with its default binding of Ctrl+;. I was vaguely aware that you could do manual checks or even check a whole buffer but I never used them.

Batsov’s post discusses some of those other commands. You can, for example, use Ctrl+, to move to the next misspelling. Then you can use Ctrl+. or Ctrl+; to correct it.

I like Ctrl+; because the point doesn’t have to be on the misspelling; it corrects the previous error wherever it is. Batsov, on the other hand, likes Ctrl+c $ because it gives you a menu of possible corrections as well as options to accept it in the current buffer, accept it in the current session, or add it to your dictionary. The key binding is—for me—significantly more awkward so I’m going to stick with Ctrl+; unless I want to add the word to my dictionary.

But Batsov is a serious Emacs user and his recommendations shouldn’t be ignored. Read his post and see what you think. As usual, Emacs has got you covered whatever your preferences.

Update [2025-04-01 Tue 21:29]: Fix link.

I’ve written a couple of times about Álvaro Ramírez’s Journelly [1, 2] and how it seemed like a good fit for my memo book needs. In the last of those posts, Ramírez announced that he was starting an official beta program. I wrote that I might sign up but as usual inertia prevailed and I didn’t get around to it.

In his latest post on Journelly, Ramírez notes that Mac Observer has a review of Journelly. I hopped over there to take a look and was impressed. It’s a nice review and makes Journelly seem like an even better fit for my needs than I had previously thought. If you’re the slightest bit interested in Journelly or think you might be, you should definitely take a look at the Mac Observer review.

Ramírez’s posts on Journelly tend to emphasize it’s use as a sort of private Twitter/X but the Mac Observer review makes clear that it can also be used as a kind of journaling app as well. One of the best parts, from my point of view, is that the data is saved in Org mode format so I should be able to integrate it into my Emacs workflow easily.

In any event, I was finally able to bestir myself to email Ramírez and ask for a beta invite. He responded right away with my invite and I installed it without a problem. I’ve never participated in an iOS beta before and wasn’t sure how to get the beta app installed. It turns out to be easy. Apple has a special app called TestFlight that automates everything. You simply install TestFlight, click on the invite, and everything else happens automatically.

I just finished the install and haven’t had time to play with Journelly yet but I’ll let you know what I think as soon as I get a bit of experience with it.

Bozhidar Batsov has posted another in his long list of informative Emacs posts. This time, it’s about configuring Emacs garbage collection. The principal way of doing that is to set gc-cons-threshold to a higher value than its default of 80000. Batsov has his set to 50000000 and is wondering if he should increase it.

On the other hand, picking a correct value is far from trivial. Batsov includes some text from Eli Zaretskii, the current Emacs maintainer, that says setting the value too high will adversely affect performance.

Garbage collection is notoriously difficult to configure correctly in any application and I have no special insight into what the correct value should be in any particular situation. What I can do, though, is tell you what I do, which works very well for me. I virtually never see a pause for garbage collection. On the other hand, I don’t invoke a lot of memory hungry functions so my results may differ from yours.

I long ago gave up tweaking gc-cons-threshold and installed gcmh to handle garbage collection for me. Gcmh is based on the observation that if Emacs has been idle for 15 seconds, it will probably be idle longer so it’s a good time kick off garbage collection. It does this by setting the normal threshold very high but when it sees that Emacs is idle, it sets it to a low value to kick off garbage collection. The explanation of how it works is here.

Gcmh tells you every time it kicks off garbage collection and I frequently see this when I stop typing for a bit. The system works really well for me. As I say, I never see a delay for garbage collection. If you’re seeing problems in that area, give gcmh a try and see how it works for you.

Over at The MKat, Marie K. Ekeberg has a post that brings me back to my earliest days of using Emacs. Before I was assimilated, I tried several times to warm up to Emacs but it wouldn’t take. Ekeberg’s post reminds me why. It was what I considered the schizophrenic default scrolling. You would move the cursor down the screen and suddenly, about three quarters of the way down, the screen would jump several lines. Every time I saw that, I would abandon my attempt to embrace Emacs and run screaming back to Vim.

In her post on smoother scrolling, Ekeberg offers an explanation for this bizarre behavior that I’m pretty sure is correct. The TL;DR is that in the old days, when Emacs was developed, scrolling was an expensive operation so rather than scroll by line, Emacs would scroll by (essentially) half pages.

I have no idea why the default hasn’t long since been changed but as far as I know, it hasn’t. I say, “as far as I know” because years and years ago I did what Ekeberg suggests and implemented smooth scrolling. I haven’t looked back.

It turns out that fixing this is far from trivial. I have no memory of how I figured it out but I do know that it involved pleading with the Internet for an answer. Take a look at Ekeberg’s post to see the answer. What she suggests is essentially what I did. As I said, not at all obvious.

It’s odd how a simple thing like scrolling can ruin your appreciation of Emacs but it sure did affect mine. Don’t let that happen to you. Take a look at Ekeberg’s post and find peace of mind.

Back in the bad old days when personal computers weren’t nearly as reliable as they are today, it was common to have your computer crash when you were right in the middle of writing a document. Because of that, a common mantra was, “save early and often”. That way, when the crash came you would have only a few lines to rewrite.

I first heard the particular expression “save early and often” from Jerry Pournelle but it may not have originated with him. It was common advice back then but the humorous twist does seem like Pournelle, so who knows. In any event, in those days it wasn’t just good advice, it was mandatory.

I was reminded of all this the other day when I was writing yesterday’s post on the latency of computer operations. I was switching back and forth between the post’s Emacs buffer and Ahmad’s post in Safari, when Safari suddenly froze and I couldn’t find a way to break out of it and get back to Emacs to save my buffer, which, sadly, I hadn’t bothered to backup as I went along. In the end, I had to reboot the machine to get things back to normal.

Of course my whole post was gone when my laptop came back up. Note that this was not Emacs’ fault. It was Safari that froze and it was me that didn’t bother saving my work. Actually, Emacs was the hero in all this because the autosave function rescued me from my folly. I hardly ever need to use it so I always have a hard time remembering what to do but in the end I got almost my whole post back.

The takeaway from all this is that even with reliable hardware and software, crashes and freezes can still happen so if you care about your work make sure to back it up often. Or, as Pournelle would have it, early and often. If you don’t, the day will come when even Emacs can’t save you.