From time to time I take note of some particularly egregious example of stupidity from the new Luddites. The last time was here; see that post for links to the others. Today, we have another example in Judith Shulevitz’s article in the New Republic on how Siri is messing up a whole generation of children.
Shulevitz starts with a vignette about her daughter playing with her iPhone and interacting with Siri. After a while, the daughter gets frustrated with Siri’s inability to hold a full-fledged conversation and tells her she’s fired. That’s not the problem, though. The danger is that Siri will get smarter and be able to hold better conversations. From there it’s a speedy descent into psychobabble. There’s the problem of Siri’s failure to live up to the “maternal expectations” of the child. Then we move onto the possibility that Siri and other modern interactive devices will engender a slave owner mentality in our children.
I won’t bother pointing out the obvious silliness in all this. You should read it and see for yourself. I’ll say it again to these people: If you don’t like the modern world, you’re welcome to ignore it but, please, leave the rest of us alone.
Posted in General
Surprise! It turns out that the NSA was looking at the phone calls and emails of Americans without a warrant after all. According The Guardian, James Clapper sent a letter to Sen. Ron Wyden admiting to the practice. What’s surprising is not that they are doing this—we all assumed they were—it’s that Clapper admitted it.
The problem for Clapper is that he’s been caught lying to Congress on the public record. When he denied collecting information on millions or tens of millions of Americans, Wyden knew he was lying but couldn’t say so because the information was classified. Now Clapper has put the truth on the record.
That should result in his indictment for lying to Congress but of course it won’t. Even if Congress refers the matter to the Justice Department, the DOJ will ignore it just as they did when Congress referred Attorney General Holder for contempt. These people are corrupt and drunk on power. And why not? They obviously have nothing to fear.
Posted in General
Jean-Philippe Paradis over at HexstreamSoft has a nice page about getting started with the Common Lisp Hyperspec. If you’re already familiar with the Hyperspec, you’re probably with most of the material. If you’re not, it’s a nice introduction.
One thing that I found really helpful was detailed instructions for installing a local copy of the Hyperspec on your computer. If you often find yourself working off line, that can be a real lifesaver.
Paradis has a lot of Common Lisp material on his site so if you’re there for the Hyperspec introduction, take a look around at some of his other offerings.
Oleh Krehel has a nifty new package that brings
ace-jump-mode functionality to links in help and info buffers. The package, ace-link, makes following links easy by putting letters in front of each link. You follow the link by picking the appropriate letter.
It’s available through MELPA so installing it is easy. The only thing you need to do is initialize the binding (‘o’ by default) by adding
init.el file. Alternatively, you could set the key map manually and use some other key.
I just loaded
ace-link and while I’ve played around with it, I haven’t used it “for real” yet. So far, though, I like it a lot. Just as
ace-jump-mode gives you an easy way to jump around in your buffer,
ace-link makes it easy to follow links.
Posted in General
SBCL 1.1.17 is out. As usual, it built and passed the tests without problems. This months release has a bunch of bug fixes and a couple of enhancements/optimizations. See the NEWS page for details.
And no, despite Rainer Joswig’s April 1st announcement, there is no support for Clojure.
Bruce Connor has an interesting new package up at GitHub. It’s the fancy-narrow package that, as he puts it, imitates
narrow-to-region with more eye candy. At first I hated the idea. Being crotchety and grumpy, I’m inclined to treat “eye-candy” with disdain. After all, didn’t I rail against those who wanted Emacs to be prettier?
After a nice nap, though, I had second thoughts. What
fancy-narrow does is identical to
narrow-to-region except that instead of blanking the text outside of the narrowed region, it grays it out. The grayed out text is readonly and unreachable. The advantage of
fancy-narrow is that the surrounding text is still there for context.
The disadvantage is that the surrounding text is still there. To me, the main reason for using one of the narrowing commands is that you see only the text you’re interested in and nothing else is there to distract you. Graying out the other text makes it less intrusive but it’s still there.
I still can’t decide if I like it enough to install but I can see how it might be helpful. What do the rest of you think? Is this something you’d find useful?
Posted in General
When I want to draw structural directed graphs and network diagrams my first choice is always dot from the graphviz suite. The syntax is reasonably simple and the documentation has lots of examples to serve as go-bys.
The other day, Grant Rettke, whose blog you should definitely follow, had a post on configuring cask. That’s something I’ve been meaning to investigate so I was happy to see his post. But more interesting to me was the example he gave on configuring cask for graphviz-dot-mode, a mode for editing dot files.
If you like syntax highlighting—and who doesn’t—and write dot files, this package seems like a useful addition to your Emacs resources. Once again, Emacs shows that it can adapt to whatever task is at hand. Having syntax highlighting and formatting for
dot files is probably not life changing but it does reduce friction a bit in your work flow. And that’s always a win.
Posted in General
I came across this tweet from Sacha Chua
and decided to take a look. I’m glad I did. The page is a detailed list of Chua’s goals. If you’re a Chua fan like me, the existence of such a page is not a surprise but why should we care? Aside from what we might learn from the goals themselves, the generation of the page has a lot to teach us.
One of the features of the page is a graph that maps her goals and how they relate to each other. What’s nice is that the graph is generated programmatically from the text on the page. That would involve a lot of work but for the fact that the page was generated from an Org source file. There are some interesting things about that file.
First is that, in the manner of reproducible research, everything to generate the page is included in the Org file including the Elisp code that generates the
dot file for the graph, and the invocation of
graphviz that produces the
png for the graph.
The second interesting thing is her use of
org-map-entries to iterate through the goals. This eliminates at lot of the parsing that she would otherwise have to do.
Finally, Chua came up with a nice trick to wrap the labels in the graph. To see the advantage of this, she includes an old copy of the graph, without the wrapping, at the end of page. In order to keep the nodes reasonably small, she wraps the longer lines into two or more lines by inserting the label string into a buffer with the appropriate
fill-column value and calling
If you’re interested in using Babel and Org-mode in a reproducible research manner, studying Chua’s code will pay dividends.
Back in July of last year I wrote about a great SciPy 2013 talk by John Kitchin on using Emacs, Org Mode, and Python for reproducible research. Today, I came across a reference to the talk, rewatched it, and enjoyed it all over again.
If you’re involved in research or produce technical documents and haven’t seen this video, I urge you to give it a watch. It’s less than 22 minutes so it doesn’t demand a huge time commitment. If you’ve already watched it, you may, like me, enjoy seeing it again. I’m mentioning this again mostly for the benefit of those who might have missed it the first time.
Posted in General
Tagged Emacs, Org-mode
Via Jean-Philippe Paradis, I came across this CSS tutorial by Xah Lee. It’s nice because the page shows several examples of CSS effects. When you click on an effect, it takes you to a short tutorial that discusses the effect and shows the code. The tutorials also have links to other documentation.
If you’re an expert CSS user, this probably won’t be as useful to you as it is to someone like me who only rarely writes CSS. I always have to look things up and before seeing this page wouldn’t have had any idea how to produce the effects or even how to find out efficiently.
If you don’t already know this stuff and sometimes produce Web pages—even if it’s with something like Org Mode—you should take a look at the page. I’ve bookmarked it in my Docs bookmark so I can find it easily the next time I need it.
Posted in Programming
Tagged CSS, Tech