There’s a tiny ISP in Utah, USA. It has a sole proprietor and very limited resources. Still, it does what few others are willing or able to do. For the last 15 years, Xmission has refused to honor any request for user data unless it is accompainied by a court-issued warrant.
In those 15 years, it has only once provided data and that was when it was presented with a warrant from FISA. For owner Pete Ashdown it’s simple: if you don’t have a court-issued warrant, the request is unconstitutional and he’s not going to honor it. He has maintained that stance even in the face of a local law passed a few years ago that law enforcement could request data without a warrant. Ashdown says it’s easy to get a warrant and if you don’t get one you don’t get the data. The fact that he has only once acquiesced shows how easy it is to resist government extra-legal snooping if you have the courage and will.
Then there’s Microsoft1. A huge company with practically unlimited resources and substantial political clout. Unlike Xmission, they are only too happy to sell out their customers and then lie about it. Think that’s hyperbolic? Think I’m just Microsoft bashing? See for yourself2.
How can a company that provides the NSA with a backdoor to the Outlook encryption function before it’s even released be said to be looking out for their customers? How can a company that worked with the NSA to provide them easier access (through the Prism program) to their SkyDrive cloud service be said to respect their customer’s privacy? How can a company that, at the same time, provides the NSA with the audio and visual content of Skype calls and claims that “Skype is committed to respecting your privacy and the confidentiality of your personal data, traffic data and communications content” be said to be being honest with their customers?
If all that seems shocking, you’ve seen nothing yet. Go read the article. Microsoft’s whoring for the NSA is disgusting beyond words. They say, of course, that they have to obey the law, which is fair enough, but the thing is, there is no law requiring vendors to build in back doors for government snooping. We know this because the FBI has been whining for years about their sources going dark and asking Congress to pass laws requiring such back doors.
If you think it’s only about national security, think again. As the article makes clear, the NSA shares this data with the FBI and the CIA. They call it “a team sport.” Read, if you can stomach it, the effusive praise for Microsoft’s cooperation from the FBI and NSA.
This affects us all. If you’re an American, your fellow Americans are conspiring to spy on you. If you’re not an American, you don’t have even the presumption of rights so your situation is worse. If, after reading the Guardian story linked above you’re still using Microsoft products, you have only yourself to blame for the inevitable loss of privacy.
Footnotes:
1 Perhaps the other tech giants are equally guilty; we’ll have to wait to see. For now, this is the only specific information we have.
2 What follow assumes, of course, that the Guardian story is correct. Given their track record on the NSA story, I’m willing to give them the benefit of doubt on this.