{"id":179,"date":"2011-07-30T09:50:00","date_gmt":"2011-07-30T13:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/irreal.org\/blog\/?p=179"},"modified":"2011-12-27T13:05:25","modified_gmt":"2011-12-27T18:05:25","slug":"the-new-luddites-redux","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/irreal.org\/blog\/?p=179","title":{"rendered":"The New Luddites Redux"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>It&#8217;s been a long time since I&#8217;ve written about the New Luddites&mdash;the last time was early on in my old blog (<a href=\"http:\/\/irrealblog.blogspot.com\/2009\/11\/help-help-my-brain-is-being-rewired-i.html\">1<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/irrealblog.blogspot.com\/2009\/12\/rewire-redux-few-posts-ago-i-ranted.html\">2<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/irrealblog.blogspot.com\/2009\/12\/new-luddites-part-3-new-luddites-have.html\">3<\/a>)&mdash;but sadly their silliness has surfaced again. I follow Shelly Palmer&#8217;s <a href=\"#Digital-Living\">Digital Living<\/a> blog, which is geared towards the non-technical user of consumer electronics but often has interesting posts. Yesterday he <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shellypalmer.com\/2011\/07\/smartphone-users-anonymous\/\">reported<\/a> on a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2011\/HEALTH\/07\/28\/ep.smartphone.obsessed.cohen\/\">CNN article<\/a> that discussed smartphone users obsessively checking their phones. That article, in turn, mentioned a study published in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hiit.fi\/u\/oulasvir\/scipubs\/Oulasvirta_2011_PUC_HabitsMakeSmartphoneUseMorePervasive.pdf\">Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p> Palmer begins by poking fun at the study for belaboring the obvious but then goes on to take its conclusions seriously and offer &ldquo;solutions&rdquo; for our addictive behavior. The study itself is not particularly compelling. Its methodology is <i>ad hoc<\/i> and its sample sizes are ludicrously small (the largest of the 3 studies had 36 participants, another 12, and the last studied 3 groups with single digit participants). <\/p>\n<p> What are the study&#8217;s results that have so alarmed Palmer? The participants checked their smartphones an average of 34 times a day. Really? Assuming they were sleeping 8 hours a day that amounts to checking their phones every half hour. That&#8217;s addictive behavior? <\/p>\n<p> First of all, it&#8217;s silly to use the word addictive with its overtones of alcoholism or hard drug use. <i>Those<\/i> habits clearly <i>are<\/i> harmful both physically and emotionally. The most harmful thing pointed to by the CNN article was that one man&#8217;s frequent checking of his smart phone annoyed his wife. Many people today choose to live a digital life: they read ebooks, get their bills as emails, keep electronic diaries, maintain friendships through social media, use Google as a sort of associative memory, and most of all stay connected all the time. The device that enables this lifestyle is the smartphone. <i>Of course<\/i> these people check their phones frequently. <\/p>\n<p> To devise tactics to reduce smartphone use as Palmer suggests makes no sense except as a bizaro world yes-I-can type of experiment. Twenty years ago the equivalent exercise would have been to go without electricity and air conditioning for a week just to prove you could. Just as it was silly to worry about becoming habituated to electricity and A\/C, it&#8217;s silly to forgo the advantages of smartphones on the grounds that using them twice an hour is addictive behavior. The New Luddites are always with us, of course, but I was surprised and saddened to see the author of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Overcoming-Digital-Divide-reinvent-yourself\/dp\/0979195675\/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1312032857&amp;sr=1-1\">Overcoming the Digital Divide: How to use Social Media and Digital Tools to reinvent yourself and your career<\/a> give them aid and comfort. <\/p>\n<p> <b>Update<\/b>: bizzaro &rarr; bizaro <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s been a long time since I&#8217;ve written about the New Luddites&mdash;the last time was early on in my old blog (1, 2, 3)&mdash;but sadly their silliness has surfaced again. I follow Shelly Palmer&#8217;s Digital Living blog, which is geared &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/irreal.org\/blog\/?p=179\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-179","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/irreal.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/irreal.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/irreal.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irreal.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irreal.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=179"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/irreal.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":527,"href":"https:\/\/irreal.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179\/revisions\/527"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/irreal.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=179"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irreal.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=179"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irreal.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=179"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}