Tag Archives: Reproducible-research

An Example of Why Reproducible Research Matters

Posted on 2016-04-12 by jcs

Dennis Ogbe, whom I’ve written about before, has a nice example of why reproducible research matters. If you’ve read those previous posts you know that Ogbe is a PhD student in Electrical Engineering at Purdue. As such he reads papers … Continue reading →

Posted in General | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Reproducible Research with Docker

Posted on 2015-03-05 by jcs

Karl Voit retweets this Prove reproducibility, waste less time @mgymrek Gentle intro to Docker for reproducible research http://t.co/Dtp9BuHqiv #openscience — Jason Stirnaman (@jastirn) February 11, 2015 that points to this post from Stacy Konkiel that, in turn, tells us to … Continue reading →

Posted in General | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Weird Americans

Posted on 2014-05-03 by jcs

Yesterday, I wrote about the Pacific Standard article on problems with reproducibility in the social sciences. Today I stumbled upon a second Pacific Standard article that discusses another insidious way that distortions can creep into studies in fields like psychology … Continue reading →

Posted in General | Tagged | 2 Comments

Another Argument for Reproducible Research

Posted on 2014-05-02 by jcs

As you all know, I’m a big fan of reproducible research. Most people have an idealized conception of scientific research and that, by and large, it’s all about the pursuit of truth. Sadly that’s not always the case. The problem … Continue reading →

Posted in General | Tagged | Leave a comment

Data Loss and Reproducible Research

Posted on 2013-12-26 by jcs

As long-time readers know, I’m a big fan of reproducible research (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). The aspect that I’m particularly interested in is keeping the data, software, and other supporting material together with the source for the … Continue reading →

Posted in General | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Ten Rules for Reproducible Research

Posted on 2013-11-30 by jcs

Those of you have been around for a while know I’m a big fan of reproducible research. I’ve written about it here, here, here, here, here, and here. Now Anton Nekrutenko, James Taylor, and Eivind Hovig have a nice article … Continue reading →

Posted in General | Tagged , | Leave a comment